header header
ISD home About ISD ISD Research Areas ISD's Products and Services What's New in ISD Search ISD
           



Home

New Sign NSF Student Funding

 

New signProgram at a Glance (pdf)

new sign Workshop Agenda (pdf)

New Sign Workshop Digests (pdf)

New Sign Download Call for Participation (pdf)

Download CFP (pdf)

Registration

Plenary Addresses

Special Sessions

 

General Information

Submission Information

Travel and Accommodation

 

PerMIS'08 Online
Proceedings

(pdf)

Past Workshops

 


 

 

Special Sessions

SS1 Performance Metrics for Sustainable Manufacturing
Organizers: Kevin Lyons, Mahesh Mani, and Ram Sriram, NIST

Sustainable manufacturing (SM) broadly implies the development of innovative manufacturing technologies that minimize negative environmental impacts, conserve energy and natural resources, are safe for employees, communities, and consumers, are economically sound, and enable an environmentally benign life cycle. Yet progress toward SM is hindered as industry lacks the quantifiable measurement techniques and appropriate performance metrics to objectively evaluate all aspects of sustainable manufacturing (including energy efficiency, emissions, key process technologies, modeling and simulation and standards) necessary to meet expected regulatory requirements. Research and development of new measurement methodologies and assessment technologies of product and process performance are crucial to ensure sustainability in manufacturing. Papers are invited in all topics relevant to performance evaluation and metrics for sustainable manufacturing. Some topics relevant to the session are listed below:

  • Metrics for measuring sustainability such as energy, carbon footprint, water usage, product and process performance
  • Sustainable indicators for manufacturing
  • Product standards and performance metrics
  • Data modeling for sustainability
  • Methodologies and tools which incorporate environmental manufacturing standards
  • Design for environment tools
  • Integration of sustainable parameters in life cycle assessment tools
  • Integration and interoperability among tools that promote sustainable manufacturing

 

SS2 Test and Evaluation of Unmanned and Autonomous Systems
Organizers: Mauricio Castillo-Effen and Nikita Visnevski, GE Global Research Center

Unmanned and Autonomous Systems (UAS) with ever growing levels of sophistication are being developed to assist humans in a variety of application fields. Robots have proved their usefulness assisting first responders finding survivors in disaster situations. A variety of UAS are essential assets in the arsenal of the Armed Forces of the world. Furthermore, recent developments in autonomous driving have also shown that vehicles can navigate complex urban environments without human assistance.

Yet, questions remain open as how to perform relevant developmental and operational Test and Evaluation (T&E) of UAS efficiently. Novel T&E methods and tools are needed that will allow for assessing reliability and usefulness of UAS in an unequivocal, timely, and economic manner. Test and evaluation is a key process that assists decision makers in planning and executing the acquisition of UAS for all their envisioned applications.
The military T&E community has started efforts in developing methods and tools that will assist testers in coping with challenges imposed by systems with growing levels of machine cognition. In addition, a roadmap for T&E of UAS for the military domain is being developed. Nevertheless, more input from the scientific community is needed, which may help shaping this emerging multidisciplinary research field. Researchers from all disciplines are invited to submit contributions and report relevant research in the following areas:

  • T&E of cognitive autonomous systems.
  • T&E of human-in-the-loop systems observed as jointly cognitive.
  • T&E of multiple autonomous systems in collaborative operations.
  • T&E of emergent behavior arising from interactions of individual behaviors within a single system or from the interaction of multiple autonomous systems.
  • Systems engineering perspective of T&E of UAS.
  • T&E of lethal behaviors.
  • Mission-based capability-driven T&E.
  • Cross-disciplinary approaches to T&E of UAS. For example, tools and methods from neuroscience, cognitive science, psychology, sociology, etc. with potential applicability to T&E of UAS.

 

SS3 Is an Agent Theory of Mind (ToM) Valuable for Adaptive, Intelligent Systems?
Organizer: Gary Berg-Cross, Knowledge Strategies

Theory of Mind (ToM) is a way of looking at special cognitive capacity by which a cognitive agent understands and predicts external behavior of others by attributing unobservable mental states, such as beliefs, desires and intentions. As part of the 9th iteration of the Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems workshop (PerMIS'09) we are organizing a session that more directly addresses a "Theory of Mind". We believe this session will help address scientific and practical goals towards a "Scientific Theory of Mind" to "extend the frontiers of human knowledge to include a scientific understanding of the processes in the human brain that give rise to the phenomenon of mind.” The session will address philosophical, research and robotic implementations central to the topic. This includes prediction and imitation of behavior of others by attributing internal states, such as knowledge, beliefs, and intentions as well as how these may affect performance, resilience and adaptability of intelligent systems.

Important topic areas include:

  • Philosophical analysis of the hypothesis that beliefs and desires are the central mental states required to make sense of behavior and resulting questions about what heuristics/lower cognitive abilities needed for a ToM to develop and to make a ToM computationally practical
  • Developmental issues to better understand the consistent path of ToM
  • The relation of self reflection, joint attention, communication, imitation, or episodic memory to a ToM,
  • Modular vs. explanatory theory formulations of a ToM.
  • Robotic tests of a ToM
  • How important is ToM to levels of autonomy?
  • What cognitive architectures can support a ToM

 

SS4 An Ontology for Robotics Science and Systems
Organizers: Erwin Prassler and Herman Bruyninckx

The field of robotics research has reached a state of matureness which makes a well-defined, commonly agreed terminology indispensable.
Apart from a few sub-domains, in which first attempts have been made to establish a common terminology and to elaborate on the semantical dependencies between specific terms, there is no established ontology for robotics.

The prime objective of this special session is to kick-off a community activity towards developing an ontology for robotics science and systems. In the session we will discuss issues such as:

  • the general process and methodology
  • earlier attempts and state of the art
  • ontologies in related areas
  • taxonomies of robotics

 

SS5 TRANSTAC: Performance Evaluation of Speech Translation Systems for Military Applications
Organizers: Craig Schlenoff and Brian Weiss, NIST

Designing and implementing a performance evaluation of an emerging technology to present a broad picture of technology performance in its typical operating environment is a very challenging goal. Intelligent systems tend to be complex and non-deterministic, involving numerous components that are jointly working together to accomplish an overall goal. As intelligent systems emerge and take shape, it is important to understand their capabilities and limitations. Evaluations are a means to assess both quantitative technical performance and qualitative end-user utility.

The System, Component and Operationally Relevant Evaluation (SCORE) Framework has been developed at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) over the past three years to provide formative evaluations of advanced military technologies that are still under development. SCORE is built around the premise that, in order to get a true picture of how a system performs in the field, it must be evaluated at the component level, the system level, and within operationally-relevant environments. To date, SCORE has been used to evaluate a wide range of advanced technologies, including Soldier-worn sensor systems, technologies allowing real-time multimedia information sharing among Soldiers in the field and autonomous robotic platforms. It has been the foundation for ten technology evaluations involving Soldiers and Marines from around the country.

TRANSTAC is a DARPA advanced technology and research program whose goal is to demonstrate capabilities to rapidly develop and field free-form, two-way speech-to-speech translation systems enabling English and foreign language speakers to communicate with one another in real-world tactical situations where an interpreter is unavailable. Several prototype systems have been developed under this program for numerous military applications including force protection and medical screening.

DARPA asked NIST to assess the performance of the TRANSTAC systems using the SCORE framework. In particular, NIST was asked to assess the usability and performance of the overall translation system and to individually assess the technical performance of each component of the system (the speech recognition, the machine translation, and the text-to-speech). NIST has served as the independent evaluation teams for the TRANSTAC program over the past three years.

 

SS6 Performance Measurements Towards Improved Forklift Safety
Organizer: Roger Bostelman, NIST

Important topic areas include:

  • Generic Safety Issues of Manned and Unmanned Forklifts
  • Tracking Manned and Unmanned Forklifts
  • AGV Forklifts ­ Current State and What is Still Needed
  • Future Sensors on and off Forklifts
  • Recommendations for Next Generation Forklifts
  • Seeing around loads
  • Detection of other vehicles, driver alerts
  • Automatic deceleration upon pedestrian detection
  • Knowing the difference between obstacles and humans

Within the above topics, we will discuss associated forklift and/or sensor performance measurements and standards.


isd-webmaster@cme.nist.gov
Date Created: July 14, 2009
Last updated: September 17, 2009